Tiny Tots, Big Lies: Uncovering Early Deception in Infants
It turns out our littlest Aussies might be more cunning than we give them credit for. New research suggests that babies can master the art of deception even before they celebrate their first birthday, employing a surprisingly sophisticated range of tactics from simple denial to outright fabrication.
A groundbreaking study, spearheaded by the University of Bristol, has revealed that a significant portion of infants begin to grasp the concept of deception remarkably early. Researchers found that approximately a quarter of children understand the nuances of deception by the tender age of 10 months, a figure that doubles to half by 17 months. As they approach their third birthday, these young minds become considerably more adept, creative, and frequent in their ability to bend the truth.
Professor Elena Hoicka, a leading education expert at Bristol University and the principal author of the study, expressed her astonishment at the findings. “It was fascinating to uncover how children’s understanding and usage of deception evolves from a surprisingly young age and builds in their first years so they become quite adept and cunning ‘little liars’,” she stated.
The comprehensive study drew upon the observations of over 750 parents from across the United Kingdom, the United States, Australia, and Canada. These parents provided detailed accounts of their children’s developmental journey with deception, covering a wide age range up to 47 months.

The earliest documented instance of deceptive behaviour was reported by a parent whose child exhibited such traits at just eight months old. In total, 130 parents meticulously documented 16 distinct categories of deceptive actions displayed by their children before they reached 47 months of age.
These “sneaky habits” encompassed a broad spectrum of behaviours. They included:
- Feigning Ignorance: Pretending not to hear or understand instructions, particularly to avoid chores or responsibilities like tidying up.
- Object Concealment: Hiding toys or other items to prevent them from being shared or taken away.
- Outright Denial: Flatly denying an action, such as eating a forbidden treat, even when evidence to the contrary is present.
- Secret Activities: Engaging in forbidden behaviours when they believe they are unobserved.
Beyond these more direct forms of deception, children also employed a variety of persuasive and evasive tactics. These included:
- Making Excuses: Offering justifications for not complying with requests, such as claiming the need to use the toilet when asked to tidy.
- Exaggeration and Understatement: Manipulating the perceived severity or significance of events.
- Feigned Misunderstanding: Pretending not to grasp what is being asked or what they have seen.
- Storytelling and Fabrication: Creating entirely new narratives to mislead.
- Pretending Not to See: Deliberately averting their gaze from something they shouldn’t be looking at.
- Information Withholding: Choosing not to share relevant details.
- Omission of Details: Leaving out crucial parts of a story to create a different impression.

More advanced strategies observed in older toddlers included:
- Partial Truths: Restructuring responses to include some factual information while omitting key elements.
- Vagueness: Being deliberately unclear to avoid direct accountability.
- Distraction: Shifting the focus of attention to divert from the deceptive act.
Professor Hoicka elaborated on the progression of these behaviours, noting, “From two years, deception tends to be action-based, or require only basic spoken responses, like pretending not to hear their parent say ‘time to tidy up’, hiding things from others, or denial – such as eating chocolate but shaking head to say ‘no’ when asked if they ate chocolate.” She added, “It could also extend to doing forbidden activities in secret, for example looking in a bag they were told not to look in when no-one is apparently watching or making excuses, such as claiming to need the toilet, when asked to tidy up.”
The researchers believe this study offers invaluable insights for parents and educators, providing a clearer understanding of how children develop more sophisticated deceptive behaviours as they mature. Professor Hoicka offered reassurance, stating, “deception is entirely normal in toddler development.”
She further advised, “They can also look at our findings to know which types of deception to expect by age, so they can better understand and communicate with their children in order to stay one step ahead of their deceit.”
This research also prompts a re-evaluation of our understanding of deception within the broader philosophical context. Professor Jennifer Saul, a philosopher at the University of Waterloo and a co-author of the study, commented, “Philosophers have long reflected on the morality of human deception, but always focused on adults deceiving one another. This study shows just how much complexity gets overlooked by that focus.” The findings underscore the intricate cognitive development occurring in early childhood, revealing a capacity for strategic thinking and social navigation that is far more advanced than previously assumed.




