This week, many Americans have witnessed firsthand Donald Trump’s assertive leadership style, particularly his inclination to employ law enforcement and military personnel to navigate political challenges. In the wake of months of unrest in various American cities, the President has been strategically using the presence of armed Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officers in over a dozen major airports. This move is seen as a tactic to pressure Democrats into supporting his legislative agenda.
However, reports indicate that ICE officers have largely been observed standing by, leaning on barriers, engaging in conversations and using their phones, or observing lengthy security queues they cannot expedite. This deployment is the latest in a series of what critics describe as performative actions and politically motivated posturing designed to compel Democratic officials to align with his administration. Simultaneously, these actions have been associated with the deployment of forceful, and at times deadly, tactics against both citizens and immigrants.
Whether it involves dispatching ICE and Border Patrol agents to Minneapolis or directing the National Guard to assist with litter collection in the nation’s capital, Mr. Trump frequently treats federal law enforcement and the federalised military as his personal force. This approach has led one federal judge to characterise it as “a national police force with the president as its chief.”
Democratic officials and civil liberties organisations have accused the President of orchestrating crises to justify the presence of federal personnel in their states and cities. They contend that he then declares “victory” once these forces are inevitably withdrawn, only to redeploy them elsewhere, leaving communities in distress.
Unburdened by close advisors who might challenge his impulses, especially in his second term, Mr. Trump appears to be pursuing strategies similar to those he considered during his first term. During that period, he allegedly encouraged law enforcement to “crack skulls” and “beat the f*** out” of protesters, or even to “just shoot them.”
In Minnesota, thousands of immigrants were apprehended during a surge of federal agents. The President cited allegations of widespread fraud as a justification for what local officials termed an ongoing “invasion.” Crucially, none of these arrests were directly linked to the initial fraud investigations. ICE and Border Patrol agents were involved in two fatalities, and an additional death occurred while in custody. This adds to a grim record of in-custody deaths under ICE, which is currently on track to be the deadliest under any administration in decades.
Approximately 2,500 National Guard troops were mobilised from their home states to patrol Washington, D.C. Mr. Trump described this deployment as a response to an “epidemic of crime.” However, members of Congress have struggled to identify specific, tangible crime reduction successes directly attributable to these efforts. The Congressional Budget Office estimated that domestic troop deployments across the nation last year incurred costs close to half a billion dollars.
In an effort to break a partial government shutdown, which began after Democratic lawmakers refused to allocate additional funding to Homeland Security without safeguards against future violence and warrantless arrests, Mr. Trump deployed ICE officers to at least 14 airports. Travellers at these locations were experiencing extended wait times for security screening.
Twice within the same week, Mr. Trump also proposed deploying National Guard troops to airports.


The White House maintains that ICE is making a meaningful contribution, citing instances where officers have distributed water or held travellers’ places in security queues. Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt reported an incident at John F. Kennedy International Airport in New York where an ICE officer “jumped into action and restored an infant’s breathing who was unresponsive.”
ICE officers were observed verifying identification at security checkpoints in several airports, and in some cases, waving travellers through. It remains unclear, however, whether these actions have genuinely expedited the security process. A spokesperson for Homeland Security stated that the officers had undergone “standard TSA training curriculum” to assist.
Mr. Trump’s own understanding of the officers’ roles appeared somewhat fluid. On Monday, he suggested they were conducting immigration arrests and providing “security like no one has ever seen before.” Just two days later, he thanked them for “helping people with bags” and “picking up and cleaning areas” with their “much larger, and harder, muscles.”
Conversely, Transportation and Security Administration (TSA) agents have indicated that ICE officers are unable to perform their duties, especially given that TSA workers have been without pay for over a month due to the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) shutdown. Many TSA employees seem uncertain about the specific contributions of ICE personnel, beyond their presence and salaries.
“They’re the reason that we’re not getting paid,” one TSA worker expressed to New York magazine. “A tweet went out and the next day they’re at the airport walking around sipping coffees, holding on to their vest,” the worker continued. “They arrived on Monday, and now they’re hanging out in the break room doing nothing. They’re warming up their lunch. I don’t know what you’re hungry from — you didn’t do anything!”
The presence of ICE at airports appears to serve as a warning to both Democrats and Republicans who are obstructing his legislative agenda in Congress. The implicit message is clear: either fund DHS and pass a broad election law that also targets transgender Americans, or face further disruptions.
“The Democrat shutdown has created chaos for American travelers and TSA employees alike,” White House spokeswoman Abigail Jackson told The Independent. “Our great ICE officers are always ready to step in and help the American people when needed,” she added. “President Trump’s brilliant idea to send ICE to airports has helped make the travel process smoother for travelers and provided much-needed relief to TSA employees who the Democrats have forced to work without pay for so long.”


After repeatedly rejecting Democratic proposals that would have provided separate funding for the TSA while broader DHS funding was debated, Republicans were reportedly lobbying the White House to declare a state of emergency. This move was seen as a desperate attempt to extricate themselves from the ongoing funding impasse.
On Thursday night, Mr. Trump announced his intention to “sign an order to ‘immediately pay’ TSA agents.” Hours later, in the early morning, the Senate passed a measure to fund DHS, excluding ICE and Border Patrol from its provisions for the time being. “This could have been done three weeks ago,” remarked Democratic Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer.
House Republican leaders promptly rejected the Senate’s deal. The Senate is currently in recess for two weeks, extending through Easter.
Ryan Schwank, a former ICE attorney who later became a whistleblower, cautioned that ICE officers are being placed “outside their experience.” He elaborated, “Not only does this place these agents into unfamiliar roles, it forces the public to submit to a criminal checkpoint system if they wish to exercise their freedom of travel. At best, this forces Americans to accept the same kind of checkpoint systems once used in the Soviet Union and East Germany. At worst, it could result in a violent confrontation between a tired traveler and an inexperienced agent.”




